Open Access and Free of Charge

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Textile Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Textile Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.


The aim of this study is to provide a method to
evaluate the intermingled nip stability. For this purpose,
polypropylene (fully drawn yarn) FDY with three types of
intermingling Heberlein jet inserts (P412, P212, and S16) and
three air pressure values of 2, 3, and 4 bar was subjected to
the texturing process. In measuring the nip stability in the
previous methods, i.e. using the nip number, it was observed
that in some long nips with special structures, a nip with
certain length under the stretching process may become
several nips with a less total entanglement length. This can
cause an error in evaluating the nip stability. Therefore, in
order to evaluate the nip stability, it is suggested to use the nip
length in the 360° study around the yarn axis to evaluate the
effect of the change in the length of the intermingled areas due
to stretching. Using the method presented in this research and
after performing experiments, the maximum and minimum
nip stability with considering the nip length were 97.3% (for
P412 jet insert and 4 bar air pressure) and 48.55% (for S16 jet
insert and 2 bar air pressure), respectively. However, the nip
stability in the same test conditions based on nip density was
74.47 and 52.94%, respectively.


[1] P.D. Baykal and I. Özkan, “The effects of intermingling process parameters and number of filaments on intermingled yarn properties”, J. Text. Inst., vol. 104, no. 112, pp. 1292-1302, 2013.
[2] M. Miao and M. Soong, “Air interlaced yarn structure and properties”, Text. Res. J., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 433-440, 1995.
[3] M.E. Yüksekkaya and I. Öztanir, “The effect of intermingling process parameters on the synthetic filament yarn strength”, J. Text. Eng., vol. 21, no. 93, pp. 10-17, 2014.
[4] I. Öztanır and M.E. Yüksekkaya, “The effect of intermingling process on the synthetic yarn stability and uniformity”, In: XIII th International Izmir Textile and Apparel Symposium; Izmir, Turkey, pp. 280-284, 2014.
[5] C. Atkinson, False Twist Textured Yarns, Elsevier, 2014, pp.124-133.
[6] H.K. Versteeg, M. Acar, and S. Bilgin, “Effect of geometry on the performance of intermingling nozzles”, Text. Res. J., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 545-551, 1999.
[7] S.S. Bhattacharya, S. Dighe, and U.A. Malek, “Effect of extra feed roller of textured intermingled yarn properties”, Man-made. Text. India, vol. 48, no. 5, 2005.
[8] R. Alagirusami and V. Ogale, “Development and characterization of GF/PET, GF/Nylon, and GF/PP commingled yarns for thermoplastic composites”, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 269-285, 2005.
[9] I. Ozkan, Y. Kuvvetli, P.D. Baykal, and C. Sahin, “Predicting the intermingled yarn number of nips and nips stability with neural network models”, Indian J. Fiber Text. Res., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 267-272, 2015.
[10] S. Afrashteh and S. Eskandarnejad, “Effect of geometrical parameters of the yarn channel in an intermingling jet on nip structure and stability of textured yarn”, J. Text. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 195-200, 2013.
[11] M. Bertolla, M. Scotoni, M. Caldara, G. Giacomelli, M. Preghenella, and E. Pasqualini, “On-line sensing of the interlacing process”, IEEE SENS., pp. 1-3, 2017. Available:
[12] G. Wickramasinghe, S.U. Dolawatte, I.U. Thebuwana, and W.S. Botheju, “Effect of intermingling process parameters on polyester/nylon melange fabric appearance”, J. Eng. Fiber. Fabric., vol. 15, pp. 1-12, 2020.
[13] J.W.S. Hearle, L. Hollick, and D.K. Wilson, Yarn Texturing Technology, Elsevier, 2001, pp. 261-263.
[14] H. Qiu and Y. Iemoto, “Effects of cross-sectional shape of yarn duct of interlacer on the properties of interlaced yarn”, J. Text. Eng., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2007.
[15] H. Qiu and M. Ge, “Evaluation of the significance of processing parameters for the characteristics of interlaced yarn”, J. Text. Eng., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 99-102, 2009.
[16] H. Qiu and Y. Iemoto, “Yarn motion in interlacers with various cross-sectional shapes of yarn duct”, J. Text. Eng., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 59-67, 2007.
[17] Y. Iemoto, S. Chono, and K. Sawazaki, “Study on interlaced yarn”, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jap., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1-5, 1989.
[18] I. Ozkan and P.D. Baykal, “The effect of the production parameters of intermingling and filament properties on the stability of yarn nips”, Tekst. Muhendis., vol. 19, no. 87, pp. 1-6, 2012.
[19] M. Taghavi Deilamani, A. Rashidi, M.E. Yazdanshenas, M.B. Moghadam, and S. Eskandarnejad, “Effect of major false-twist texturing parameters on tensile properties and crystallinity of polyester microfilament yarn and optimized by RSM”, Bulg. Chem. Commun., vol. 48, pp. 55-64, 2016.
[20] Y. Iemoto, S. Chono, and M.I. Tanida, “Model experiment on interlaced yarn part 1: single blowing method”, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jap., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 39-44, 1995.
[21] Y. Iemoto and S. Chono, “Study on interlaced yarn part 3: air flow in a yarn duct”, J. Text. Mach. Soc. Jap., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 38-46, 1997.
[22] A.K. Sengupta, K. Sen, and A. Mukhopadhyay, “False twist texturization of polypropylene multifilament yarns: part II: reducing feeder yarn crystallinity through tension annealing”, Text. Res. J., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 389-392, 1986.
[23] A.K. Sengupta, K. Sen, and A. Mukhopadhyay, “False twist texturization of polypropylene multifilament yams: part I: time-temperature effects”, Text. Res. J., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 281-286, 1986.
[24] Heberlein,, 2021.